July 17, 2003

This is funny!

...the new boss does not like cats and will probably make us get rid of the two we have at the office. He says that some of our clients might be allergic to them and that it would be unfair to make them suffer.

I am prepared to argue that because people can be allergic to soap, none of the staff should bathe. I have found a few articles that indicate that people can be allergic to soap. If we have to be sensitive to people who are allergic to cats, then why shouldn't be we senstive to people who are allergic to soap? After all, what is the inconvenience of a little body odor compared to the health of our clients? And it's not like most of them bathe anyway. New no bathing policy
This is via Brainsalad, which is a blog written by a "middle aged government attorney living in a rural section of the northeast U.S." [via blawg ring]


Previous Posts

  • I've been too busy to think lately...
  • Blawging Difficulties
  • Derek disputes Posner's dicta in Madster
  • Text Ad Site Counters
  • Shoplifting Argument gets Trashed
  • Trademarked Keyword Theft
  • OTBOM: I completely agree with both Rick and Susan...
  • Hacking the X-Box
  • Copyright Concerns over Google's Cache
  • Breaking News: RIAA Sues Puretunes.com