October 1, 2003

I wonder if the RIAA is relying on Hotaling

Copying of a lawfully obtained copyrighted work without owner’s permission and making it available for public use is a violation of the distribution right, regardless of whether public saw/obtained the work or even knew it was available. Hotaling v. Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints (4th Cir. 1997)

The reason I mention it is because I was just looking at my copyright law outline from law school. (I took copyright law with Professor Stewart Sterk, who is also a property and conflicts professor.) Anyway, I was reviewing my outline to look at statutory damages, fair use etc. just as a quick refresher to get a handle on why the RIAA lawsuits are settling so quickly and without much of a fight as to the copyright issues.


Previous Posts

  • More proof that DMCA-esque protection is out of whack with Copyright
  • Musicians discuss filesharing
  • RIAA Lawsuit Assistance
  • On the hunt for a Spammer
  • Encouraging IP lawyers to stop and think before they sue...
  • How cool are Librarians?
  • Blog Statistics
  • Around the Blogosphere
  • RIAA's Gestapo Tactics
  • Copyright law often made up as we go along