May 6, 2004

If downloaders are spitting on the Constitution...

and "devaluing the American way of life", then I can't even imagine what Andrew Burt thinks of uploaders and pirates.

Mr. Burt, you say the "Constitution is the blueprint that defines who and what we are as a country." Then tell me why do you associate yourself with the MPAA, who lobbies to take away what the Copyright clause has granted. If we're to start the name calling maybe we should call those who would deny copyright for "limited times" or who would create new "copyright" laws to punish once legal activities TRAITORS to the CONSTITUTION. I mean based on what you state above, it would seem to be a valid extension of your argument.

Frank Field pointed me to IP News Blog, who discusses the MPAA's new education efforts: "a $200k MPAA-inspired educational infusion seems misguided and wrong. Especially one that hinges on lying to children about the boundaries in the copyright line."

  • Another reason DMCA needs fair use provision
  • DVD Copying Software Tries to Skirt Law
  • to tinker is to imagine
  • MPAA's Bizarro-world logic: "There is no right in the copyright law to make backup copies of motion pictures, so the whole argument that people should have the right to make backup copies of DVDs has no legal support whatsoever," said Fritz Attaway, executive vice president of the MPAA. [via]
  • Quentin Tarantino thinks that Internet movie piracy isn't all bad. [via]


  • Previous Posts

  • The Uncivil Litigator
  • When One Man's Art Is Another's Crime
  • no adsense feeds, please
  • Should Grandma pony up $3,500 to RIAA for grandson's dl'ing?
  • Sun's thoughts on disclaimers
  • FCC Bombarded by Oprah Indecency Complaints
  • Defamer Launches
  • I printed out Google's S-1 but it's too heavy
  • just wondering
  • stay between the lines