techlawadvisor.com

TABLE of CASES
Souter

Sony Corp. of America v. Universal City Studios, Inc., 464 U. S. 417

Kalem Co. v. Harper Brothers, 222 U. S. 55

A & M Records, Inc. v. Napster, Inc., 114 F. Supp. 2d 896 (ND Cal. 2000), aff'd in part, rev'd in part, 239 F. 3d 1004 (CA9 2001)

In re Aimster Copyright Litigation, 334 F. 3d 643, 645-646 (CA7 2003)

Gershwin Pub. Corp. v. Columbia Artists Management, Inc., 443 F. 2d 1159, 1162 (CA2 1971)

Shapiro, Bernstein & Co. v. H. L. Green Co., 316 F. 2d 304, 307 (CA2 1963)

Aro Mfg. Co. v. Convertible Top Replacement Co., 377 U. S. 476, 485 (1964)

New York Scaffolding Co. v. Whitney, 224 F. 452, 459 (CA8 1915)

James Heekin Co. v. Baker, 138 F. 63, 66 (CA8 1905)

Canda v. Michigan Malleable Iron Co., 124 F. 486, 489 (CA6 1903)

Thomson-Houston Electric Co. v. Ohio Brass Co., 80 F. 712, 720-721 (CA6 1897)

Red Jacket Mfg. Co. v. Davis, 82 F. 432, 439 (CA7 1897)

Holly v. Vergennes Machine Co., 4 F. 74, 82 (CC Vt. 1880)

Renwick v. Pond, 20 F. Cas. 536, 541 (No. 11,702) (CC SDNY 1872)

Henry v. A. B. Dick Co., 224 U. S. 1, 48 (1912)

Motion Picture Patents Co. v. Universal Film Mfg. Co., 243 U. S. 502 (1917)

Dawson Chemical Co. v. Rohm & Haas Co., 448 U. S. 176, 221 (1980)

Thomson-Houston Electric Co. v. Kelsey Electric R. Specialty Co., 75 F. 1005 (CA2 1896)

Rumford Chemical Works v. Hecker, 20 F. Cas. 1342 (No. 12,133) (CC N. J. 1876)

Oak Industries, Inc. v. Zenith Electronics Corp., 697 F. Supp. 988, 992 (ND Ill. 1988)

Water Technologies Corp. v. Calco, Ltd., 850 F. 2d 660, 668 (CA Fed. 1988)

Fromberg, Inc. v. Thornhill, 315 F. 2d 407, 412-413 (CA5 1963)

Haworth Inc. v. Herman Miller Inc., 37 USPQ 2d 1080, 1090 (WD Mich. 1994)

Sims v. Mack Trucks, Inc., 459 F. Supp. 1198, 1215 (ED Pa. 1978)

Eldred v. Ashcroft, 537 U. S. 186, 223-226 (2003)

Dreamland Ball Room, Inc. v. Shapiro, Bernstein & Co., 36 F. 2d 354, 355 (CA7 1929)

Cable/Home Communication Corp. v. Network Productions, Inc., 902 F. 2d 829, 846 (CA11 1990)

Ginsburg (additional)

Matthew Bender & Co., Inc. v. West Pub. Co., 158 F. 3d 693, 707 (CA2 1998)

Breyer (additional)

Vault Corp. v. Quaid Software, Ltd., 847 F. 2d 255, 262 (CA5 1988)

Dynacore Holdings Corp. v. U. S. Philips Corp., 363 F. 3d 1263, 1275 (CA Fed. 2004)

Doe v. GTE Corp., 347 F. 3d 655, 661 (CA7 2003)

Twentieth Century Music Corp. v. Aiken, 422 U. S. 151, 156 (1975)

TABLE of AUTHORITIES

Ginsburg, Copyright and Control Over New Technologies of Dissemination, 101 Colum. L. Rev. 1613 (2001)

Lichtman & Landes, Indirect Liability for Copyright Infringement: An Economic Perspective, 16 Harv. J. L. & Tech. 395 (2003)

Peters, Brace Memorial Lecture: Copyright Enters the Public Domain, 51 J. Copyright Soc. 701, 705-717 (2004)

Wu, When Code Isn't Law, 89 Va. L. Rev. 679, 724-726 (2003)

Lemley & Reese, Reducing Digital Copyright Infringement Without Restricting Innovation, 56 Stan. L. Rev. 1345, 1386-1390 (2004)

Brief for Innovation Scholars and Economists as Amici Curiae 15-20

Brief for Emerging Technology Companies as Amici Curiae 19-25

Brief for Intel Corporation as Amicus Curiae 20-22.8

M. Nimmer & D. Nimmer, Copyright, §12.04[A] (2005)

35 U.S.C. §271(c)

W. Keeton, D. Dobbs, R. Keeton, & D. Owen, Prosser and Keeton on Law of Torts 37 (5th ed. 1984)

Van Houweling, Distributive Values in Copyright, 83 Texas L. Rev. 1535, 1539-1540, 1562-1564 (2005)

Brief for Sovereign Artists et al. as Amici Curiae 11

3 M. Nimmer & D. Nimmer, Nimmer on Copyright §12.04[A][2] (2005)

Brief for Motion Picture Studio and Recording Company Petitioners 30-38

Brief for MGM Plaintiffs-Appellants in No. 03-55894, etc. (CA9), p. 41

17 U. S. C. §504(c)(1)

Art. I, §8, cl. 8

18 U. S. C. §2319, §1961(1)(B), §1956(c)(7)(D)

S. Liebowitz, Will MP3 Downloads Annihilate the Record Industry? The Evidence So Far, p. 2 (June 2003) [pdf]

Press Release, Informa Media Group Report (5th ed. 2004)

F. Oberholzer & K. Strumpf, The Effect of File Sharing on Record Sales: An Empirical Analysis, p. 24 (Mar. 2004)

McGuire, Study: File-SharingNo Threat to Music Sales (Mar. 29, 2004);

M. Madden, Pew Internet & American Life Project, Artists, Musicians, and the Internet, p. 21 [pdf]

Benkler, Sharing Nicely: On Shareable Goods and the Emergence of Sharing as a Modality of Economic Production, 114 Yale L. J. 273, 351-352 (2004)

L. Rainie, M. Madden, D. Hess, & G. Mudd, Pew Internet Project and comScore Media Metrix Data Memo: The state of music downloading
and file-sharing online, pp. 2, 4, 6, 10 (Apr. 2004) [pdf]

M. Madden & L. Rainie, Pew Internet Project Data Memo: Music and video downloading moves beyond P2P, p. 7 (March 2005) [pdf]

Groennings, Note, Costs and Benefits of the Recording Industry's Litigation Against Individuals, 20 Berkeley Technology L. J. 571 (2005)

Evangelista, Downloading Music and Movie Files is as Popular as Ever, San Francisco Chronicle, Mar. 28, 2005, p. E1

RIAA Reveals Method to Madness, Wired News, Aug. 28, 2003,

Besek, Anti-Circumvention Laws and Copyright: A Report from the Kernochan Center for Law, Media and the Arts, 27 Colum. J. L. & Arts 385, 391, 451 (2004)

J. Borland, Tripping the Rippers, C/net News.com (Sept. 28, 2001)

Brief for Bridgemar Services Ltd. as Amicus Curiae 5-8; K. Dean, P2P Tilts Toward Legitimacy, wired.com, Wired News (Nov. 24, 2004)

Brief for Internet Law Faculty as Amici Curiae 5-20

Bruno, Digital Entertainment: Piracy Fight Shows Encouraging Signs (Mar. 5, 2005)

Audio Home Recording Act of 1992, 106 Stat. 4237 (adding 17 U. S. C., ch. 10)

Protecting Innovation and Art While Preventing Piracy: Hearing Before the Senate Comm. on the Judiciary, 108th Cong., 2d Sess. (July 22, 2004)