Two on Grokster from Copyfight

Grokster As a Lovers' Tiff: The arguments of both sides in MGM v Grokster, told as a quarrel between lovers.

Induce: The Second Coming?: Alex Halderman's inaugural post @ Freedom to Tinker provides his reflections on the Supreme Court arguments in Grokster (which he attended personally):

"What most surprised me was that several Justices repeatedly asked about a standard barely mentioned in the main briefs from either side: a so-called 'active inducement' test...The Induce Act, debated in Congress last summer, would have created a test based on an inducement theory, but it was widely criticized for giving copyright holders too much control over new technologies and making it too easy for them to bring frivolous lawsuits."

Are the Justices hinting to Congress?